Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well good for them, I hope they actually build the thing, at least someone would have the b@lls to fight that anti nuke crowd and build something that can actually get us somewhere.
1 posted on 10/29/2009 7:07:53 AM PDT by tricky_k_1972
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tricky_k_1972

I’m all for this, as long as Putin is on the first flight OUT. ;)


2 posted on 10/29/2009 7:08:32 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972

Well, there won’t be any US spacecraft in the way...thanks to the bumbling bureaucrats at NASA.


3 posted on 10/29/2009 7:11:42 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972
Yes this is true but perhaps they may succeed in granting Congresswoman Lee’s wish and get a couple of photos of the American Flag that she thought was planted there from earlier missions!
5 posted on 10/29/2009 7:12:25 AM PDT by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972

Our nation used to attempt great things like this.


6 posted on 10/29/2009 7:13:06 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972
It's the only way to travel in deep space within our technological capability. Anything beyond the moon that takes more than about three months puts humans into the four percent probability of "Radiation Exposure Induced Death" over the course of a lifetime. That's the outside limit NASA has today.

If you want to go to Mars (and return safely to the Earth) you need to get there and back a whole lot faster than the 900 day round trip needed for chemical rockets.

7 posted on 10/29/2009 7:14:10 AM PDT by Prospero (non est ad astra mollis e terris via)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972
Actuall article was pulled from Suntimes
8 posted on 10/29/2009 7:14:40 AM PDT by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972

I tend to agree. let them do the early work and testing, then we can use the technology and make it better.

However, any accident that spreads radiation will pretty much kill any further nuke ships for a very long time.


9 posted on 10/29/2009 7:21:36 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972

I thought the real problem always in the past was the actual weight of a small nuke engine...


10 posted on 10/29/2009 7:23:31 AM PDT by luckybogey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972

Once again, the left proves that the real reason for opposing nuclear power in America is to collapse our economy. It is OK with them if every country on the planet has nuclear power, except America.

CRICKETS!

This could also be a front for more disturbing Russian plans, but don’t expect the Boy King to do a thing to hamper them in any way(other than give away our missile shield program). Russia is spitting in Obama’s face and he doesn’t seem to care.


11 posted on 10/29/2009 7:24:21 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972

In this months Popular Mechanics they have a prototype of an ION engine they say can travel to Mars in 39 days.


12 posted on 10/29/2009 7:25:29 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972

Bkmk


15 posted on 10/29/2009 7:49:03 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Brave amateurs....they do their part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972
How to do it: Nuclear Salt Water Rocket. Saves on the mass required for Orion-style nuclear propulsion.
17 posted on 10/29/2009 7:53:38 AM PDT by Jagermonster (They will not force us. They will stop degrading us. They will not control us. We will be victorious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972

My thought is first things first. Dump some of NASA’s budget into space elevator research. (material science for mass high quality carbon nanotube production) Drastically reduce the cost of getting out of the gravity well and proceed with propulsion concepts such as this. My 2 cents.


23 posted on 10/29/2009 12:34:40 PM PDT by smaug6 (We can't afford to be innocent!! Stand up and face the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rio; Iowan; hattend; reader25; july4thfreedomfoundation; NorwegianViking; ...


For other space news go to: http://www.spacetoday.net


24 posted on 10/29/2009 7:01:31 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tricky_k_1972
Russia hopes nuclear ship will fly humans to Mars

Ive been saying this for years.....

Nuclear is the way to go.....

and the Nuclear to use...is Freeman Dysons Project Orion.

Mars in coupla weeks.

Lets grow some BALLS America.

29 posted on 10/30/2009 4:29:39 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson