Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaraJohnson
The constitution, the high law in the land, rules.

And the Constitution states that the only way to remove a President from office is through the impeachment process. For a judge to issue an injunction removing a sitting President from office would be nothing short of judicial tyranny.

134 posted on 10/29/2009 11:29:29 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

They practice judicial tyranny on a daily basis. Judges overturn the electorate’s wishes as a matter of practice.


144 posted on 10/29/2009 11:33:08 AM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

He did not have to issue an injuction. All he had to do was allow discovery and refer it to Congress for action or inaction.


293 posted on 10/29/2009 1:34:57 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson