Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Sons of Liberty

In his ruling he quite clearly states that the Plaintiff was asking the court to set the Constitution aside and do something the court had no Constitutional authority to do.


94 posted on 10/29/2009 11:03:35 AM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: El Sordo
In his ruling he quite clearly states that the Plaintiff was asking the court to set the Constitution aside and do something the court had no Constitutional authority to do.

A lamentable excuse. If the executive and legislative branches are both either violating or facilitating violation of the Constitution, that means the judicial branch is the only remaining defender of the people's constitutional liberties. And now this federal judge punts.
99 posted on 10/29/2009 11:06:40 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson