One provider indicated that such blocking would be difficult because determining which sites should be blocked would be a very subjective process.
Additionally, this provider noted that technologically savvy site operators could change their Internet protocol addresses, allowing users to access the site regardless. Another provider told us that some of these large bandwidth sites stream critical news information.
Furthermore, some state, local, and federal government offices and agencies, including DHS, currently use or have plans to increase their use of social media Web sites and to use video streaming as a means to communicate with the public. Shutting down such sites without affecting pertinent information would be a challenge for providers and could create more Internet congestion as users would repeatedly try to access these sites....Some providers said that the operators of specific Internet sites could shut down their respective sites with less disruption and more effectively than Internet providers, and suggested that a better course of action would be for the government to work directly with the site operators....
Okay I could see them temporarily putting the squuze on YouTube and such. No more Sunday Night Football streamed online, with 4 cameras unique to the web...
But that is as far as I think they should take it.
But then again, swine flu hasn’t come close to being the problem that seasonal flu is.
36,000 a year die from regular flu.
I think they might shut down thw whole thing except for certain approved sites like local, state and federal government websites and some “approved” news sites.