Wow, I thought even you would pick up on the fact that the author is calling into question evo-religious dating schemes.
You have a dilemma GGG, you have to agree with the timeline to agree with the conclusion that evolution hasn't happened in 58 million years. If you don't agree with the timeline then you can't agree with the conclusion.
So what is it? Do you agree with the timeline and the conclusion or do you disagree with the timeline and the conclusion? I can only assume that you agree with the 58 million year time line since it was important to you to post the article.