Replies

Again, that means a lot coming from an evo-atheist whose mission it is to pose as a Christian in order to attack genuine Christians in the name of Christianity. I have asked you numerous times if Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, and you have refused to answer each time. All Christians confess Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Let me know if you ever become an actual Christian (or are at least willing to be honest and admit that you are an evo-atheist disruptor posing as a Christian). Until then, buzz-off imposter.

I've seen you use this argument against Buck W. before. So how about if I ask it: please post two actual methods of science used by Creation scientists, with a synopsis of why they are superior to the corresponding methods that the "evo-athiests" use. Because from what I've read in these threads, it appears the Creation scientists argue against generally accepted principles like the speed of light and carbon dating. I'm curious what "superior" scientific methods are used to make these claims.

==I’ve seen you use this argument against Buck W. before

Exposing a wolf in sheep’s clothing is not an “argument.”

==So how about if I ask it: please post two actual methods of science used by Creation scientists, with a synopsis of why they are superior to the corresponding methods that the “evo-athiests” use.

Go back and reread the exchange again, and you will see that I was mocking a certain FReeper’s condescention. The scientific method is the scientific method, and the data is the data, for both sides. Where creationists and evolutionists differ is on interpretation. And when it comes to interpretation, both Creation and ID (in that order) are far superior than Darwin’s evo-religious creation myth.

PS It was the evos who invented the notion of variable light speed/decay to explain the big bang horizon problem with respect to the CBR. That problem has not gone away, btw.