Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BGHater

Everyone take a deep breath, and repeat after me:

“We shall support the most conservative candidate who can win.”

There. That’s better.

We can be as conservative and orthodox as we wish as individuals, and promote our causes as vociferously as possible.

But we must WIN. Which means, on occassion, that a mushy moderate GOPer is the only thing we could possibly get. We should hold our noses, grind our axes, and help that guy get elected.

Liberal Rs should be run out of town on a rail, a la Scuzzy. Here in Oregon, however, our formerly barely Republican Senator Smith couldn’t defeat a really Liberal douche bag. No conservative is going to win this state (though I wish otherwise). We’ll need to find candidates who are moderate to conservative, and exceptionally sexy (politically speaking). Then, we’ll hold our noses, work like heck, and defeat the douche bag.


20 posted on 11/03/2009 12:58:00 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (0bummer attacks not Unemployment, the Taliban, Deficits, China, or the Sudan, but attacks FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Miltie

YES...what YOU said!


22 posted on 11/03/2009 12:58:52 PM PST by goodnesswins (Tagline, oh tagline, whereart thou?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Miltie
But we must WIN. Which means, on occassion, that a mushy moderate GOPer is the only thing we could possibly get. We should hold our noses, grind our axes, and help that guy get elected.

Nope. No way. No more "electable" compromise candidates just because he or she has an 'R' after their name. Either they are Conservative or they or not. And I don't care if the party loses because of it. No more RINOs period.

43 posted on 11/03/2009 1:14:47 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Miltie
...support the most conservative candidate who can win.

Thanks, Uncle Miltie, for the sensible suggestion.

As much as I just LOVE the revolt in NY23, third-party candidates are almost always losers, guaranteeing victories for the least diluted vote. (Consider Mister Perot).

There are, hypothetically, some cases in which a squishy GOPer will be better than a Marxist Dem, and to be practical, there is nothing more important than trying to get ... at a minimum... the House back in 2010.

That said, the Country Club Rockefeller Republicans are very worried...and that's a good thing.

.

53 posted on 11/03/2009 1:27:17 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Miltie
Which means, on occassion, that a mushy moderate GOPer is the only thing we could possibly get. We should hold our noses, grind our axes, and help that guy get elected.

That is what got us into this mess.

We need some solid steps to the right. One of the beauties of incrementalism is that by the time you get 'there' people have forgotten what it was like where they left.

How about I recall building a garage with no permit needed.

How about putting a check in an envelope, and the postman delivering your rifle in a couple of weeks, parcel post?

How about open religious displays during the Christmas season, commerating the birth of the guy that Christmas was named after?

Prayer (optional participation--you didn't say it if you did not want to) and the Pledge of Allegiance said every day in school at the start of the day?

The ability to fill the mudhole on the back of your property and use that land--without permits?

Look America, and weep at what we have lost!

Then dig in. grit your teeth, and gird your loins for the long haul, because we're gong to take it back!

63 posted on 11/03/2009 1:55:08 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Miltie
But we must WIN. Which means, on occassion, that a mushy moderate GOPer is the only thing we could possibly get. We should hold our noses, grind our axes, and help that guy get elected.

There's a fine line between moderal and liberal, however. Some here think we should support anybody with an R, no matter what. Would you define McCain as moderate or liberal? It depends on which policy issues are important to the person, IMO.
77 posted on 11/03/2009 2:26:13 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Miltie

“We shall support the most conservative candidate who can win.”

bs

vote for the candidate that most closely fits your principles, then count the votes to determine the winner.

Any other approach let’s the liberal media determine who gets elected.


82 posted on 11/03/2009 2:35:24 PM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Miltie

“Then, we’ll hold our noses, work like heck, and defeat the douche bag.”

Not happening. There will be no more nose holding going on in this conservative household. Nor will it be happening in any household of my conservative neighbors, friends or relatives. We’re fed up and will JUST SAY NO to ANY rinos. Period.


84 posted on 11/03/2009 2:42:36 PM PST by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Miltie

that is a whole manure spreader of Bravo Sierra.

We are where we are is because we have been voting dem lite for the last 25 years ... forced to take the lesser “stench” Yeah ... howz that workin.

Einstein is correct .. keep doing what you are doing and results will not change.


106 posted on 11/03/2009 3:50:32 PM PST by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson