Posted on 11/04/2009 10:15:39 AM PST by La Lydia
Hahhaa how do you like that, gays???
Ready to come out from under the bed and SPEAK UP against dirty moslems now??
It’s about time the biggest WHINERS (gays) start whining ABOUT SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MATTERS. Namely, the dirty moslem pigs trying to take over Western civilization.
I can’t wait to watch moslems poop all over gays until they wake up and realize the SOCIALIST LEFT wants moslems in charge. They want moslems telling gays when they can smooch, what they can eat, what they can wear, what taxis they can ride in.
WELCOME TO ISLAM, HOMOSEXUALS! Come right in! This is what you’ve delivered to the USA by your SUPPORT OF COMMUNISTS/MOSLEMS like B. Hussein Omoslem, Barney Fwank, and Nazi Pelosi.
So what happens when this Jihadist wannabe throws your ass out for carrying a bottle of wine to a dinner date at your sweetie’s house? You gonna sing the same tune?
Yeah. I’m pretty consistent in my application of principles. How about you?
Yes, it is indeed his property. No question. If he wants to run a gay beauty contest on his property, parade up and down the hall in high heels - that is his right.
However, when you run a business; you forfeit the 'personal property' protection for the chance to make a profit. By applying for your business license, you are making your property 'Public' and must abide by those rules; as the 'Public' is paying for the administration of inspection (food inspectors, health inspectors, building inspectors, ADA Inspectors and the assorted safety inspectors) that constantly monitor public businesses to ensure compliance with state and federal laws.
So, while your 'Private Property' stance is correct; you are no longer considered 'Private Property' when you open a business. Whether that business is a resturant, Dental office, shipping company or a taxi cab.
Let’s see, Sharia law doesn’t permit a muslim to convey alcohol, animals, or gay people in his cab, but it’s ok for a muslim to use a car to mow down their daughter if she’s too Westernized?
Bruno: “I’ve seen a lot more go on in taxis than hugging.”
I’ll bet you have......
That would be the rule, yes.
I merely suggest that when we began to identify private businesses as "public accommodations" we may have made a mistake. It opened the door to a whole lot of government oversight and intervention.
Weird. I mean, If I owned all the roads in town, I'd stay home and have wenches feeding me peeled grapes, not go out and keep working a blue-collar job, but that's just me....
But, the law is intended for the 'Greater Good'. If a person insisted that the Food Inspector may not enter the pantry, and see rats crawling over the food - his personal property rights are placed above the health of the public.
When the Cab Driver says you may not inspect his vehicle, poor brakes endanger the public at large. The 'Greater Good' is typically designed (with exceptions, of course) for how to best service and protect the public. Any other option, places an individual in a position to inflict harm upon the public who are financing (through taxes. utilities, roads, transportation, inspectors and various agencies) the very business he intends to begin. Then we also wind up with cases where discrimination, sexual harassment and general disorder come into play. For example, if you are a local - you pay one price, but if you are not from the neighborhood - you pay double.
The intent is to provide fairness to everyone, including the property-owner. If you want to exclude specific people from your service industry - then the public business license is not for you. At that point, you would need to apply for a 'Private' business licence.
For example, in Dallas/Ft. Worth there are several counties that are 'dry'; no alcohol is allowed to be served in 'Public' resturants. So, you drop $5 to join a "Private" club at Chili's and then you can buy from the bar. Stupid, inane and pointless - but this is how you work within the framework of the law.
At least as consistent as yours...
The cab and/or business is not his. It belongs to the cab company. His Hack License is issued by NYC. Cabbies are prohibited from this kind of discrimination. If he wants to exercise his beliefs under Sharia Law, then he can damned well go back to where he came from and do it. Not here.
I’m in no way defending the behavior of these two “alternate lifestylers.” Most of us find it distasteful. It’s just not the cabbie’s right to refuse service on the grounds it offends his religion.
They’re lucky he didn’t behead them. Of course to the queers, Christians are the enemy.
“Wonder if someone should post this over at the DUmp and see how many heads explode?”
From your keyboard to God’s Ears....
Sucks to be a muslim, doesn’t it?
Horseshit! It’s Sharia law pure and simple. We are not governed by it (yet).
“But it’s his right to refuse to allow depraved acts to be performed in the back seat of his cab.”
___________________________
Depraved act? Corzine hugged Christie last night on national TV right after his concession speech. Did that offend you too?
I must have missed it from the article ... what depraved acts were the guys performing that led to the expulsion?
If it’s a private property right, can he refuse to pick up black people?
Actually I think it’s gonna be great, pitting these two over-zealous special interest groups against one another...need popcorn...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.