I was in the Army a long time ago, so maybe things have changed. But I can’t imagine a captain or a major being the victim of verbal harassment.
I think these claims are BS.
Hey State Run Media, prove it as well. Blaming “bullies” in the military and trying to paint a sympathetic picture while ignoring our “lying eyes”, 13 dead, dozens injured, DEMANDS proof.
The only fact is that Nidal Malik Hasan participated in Sudden Jihad Syndrome, period.
"Tolerance"/"Diversity" is becoming a suicide pact and an excuse to avoid truth.
Couldn’t the camel jockey just resign his commission?
Wasn’t the guy in residency at the time after 9/11? I just really doubt fellow residents were calling him names.
Predictable lib response: blame the victims, absolve the perp. Liberalism is a mental disorder.
It’s amazing how badly ABC wants this to be anybody’s fault other than the Muslim jihadist murderer.
Who harasses a major?
Which generals were calling him "camel jockey"?
This is a fabricated line of post-homicidal BS.
If anything, the Islamic voices in his head called him names, not military personnel.
Yes, United States Military and Drive By Media: PLEASE go tell the families of the victims that these murders and attempted murders were justified because this man’s car was keyed, and he was called a name.
BS statement #2, that he was “Palestinian”: There is no Palestine. His parents were Lebanese.
>> “It is one of those things where he went and wanted to kill a lot of people and commit suicide maybe in his own mind that he’s saving peoples’ lives,” said Garrett. “As illogical as that sounds, in his mind, that would be quite logical.”
I ask the following question:
Is Garrett, by projecting through Hasan’s mind, speculating that assassinating a dozen solders is “quite logical”?
I am confident that Garrett is no less appalled about the massacre than the next guy and gal. I am confident Garrett vehemently condemns Hasan’s actions, and is deeply saddened by the loss of our Country’s best. But providing any form of cover for the violence is unacceptable and overtly insensitive to everyone that’s been impacted by this horrific event.
There’s no such thing as illogical logic, but it doesn’t surprise me to see the projection of justification for such violent, heinous behavior using this twisted form of understanding. The analysis of what motivates a killer is serious business and should not be flaunted carelessly in the face of those directly affected by the killer’s deeds.