Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TimSkalaBim

I don’t think the article meant taking the mainland of Alaska from Attu. Obviously not, Attu is a looong ways from the mainland of Alaska...at least a thousand miles away, maybe more, I’d have to look at a map.

I think it meant Attu was to be the first stepping stone of taking the Aleutian chain, once the Aleutian chain was taken, they were to be the base for taking the mainland.


19 posted on 11/07/2009 1:43:48 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: sasportas

Even if the Japanese had taken the entire Aleutian Chain & gotten ashore in Alaska, I doubt that they could have accomplished anything. There were few roads suitable for moving inland or down the coast. Part of the campaign to defend Alaska involved a joint US-Canadian highway construction project that would allow defenders to move up supplies & men.

I think that the Japanese move into the western Aleutians was mostly defensive. They were well aware that the US was planning to sage long-range bombing raids against Japan from these islands. As it turned out the B29 raids came from China, then Guam & Tinian. There wasn’t any need to fight the elements in Alaska. We’d already lost so many aircraft up there.


23 posted on 11/07/2009 7:38:45 PM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson