Replies

...and I think the choice of the BDU's bespeaks (ok, with hindsight) that he wanted trusted access as part of his test of this event. The BDUs seem to me to paint with an, "I'm part of the group carrying the load for us Americans in the ME, so you can trust me" message.

I believe he was on someone's mission at this event, and we all have an interest to know that the proper, pro-American authorities are all over the facts surrounding this guy's movements, both on and off his supposed "real job."

Standing despite a repeated, authoritative order not to should henceforth send up red flags against any profilable, potential Islamist up to no good. I think it would reasonably have been time to order the waterboarding after such behavior (that we would carry such a lesson from this beast's actions.

Hasan's motionlessness as the questioner beside him spoke bespeaks some form of uncomfortability and/or training. Perhaps it was his strongly conflicted presence and intentions.

Everything about this guy needs to be investigated and brought closely under the microscope, and the military investigators should have access to and cooperation from all in government to facilitate such investigation.

If there's a Van Jones-Valerie Jarrett-type connection, this administration needs to be revetted thoroughly (up to and including Soetero's impeachment)! I want to know if Hasan's name and/or bio was ever sent up on some website, as apparently the WH used to fill many of its Special Interest positions from their trusted supporters.

HF

Further, holden, I have re-run and freeze framed oh so thoroughly YouTube Clip 1, and I can tell you this. It looks like the Ambassador had several security trailing him by a few feet. This Hasan gets up up suddenly after His Excellency has passed him by. The camera angle immediately changes to a front view of the Ambassador in a shadow walking forward toward the camera, and cut in a way you can see the security detail immediately behind him looking worryingly backwards seemily toward Hasan because of his sudden movement standing up like that (they and he are both in a bright spotlight), giving him the once over, the Director announces on the P.A. again for everyone to sit down, whereupon Hasan backs down and returns to sitting on his chair. This did not look right to me. He might have wanted to shout something at the Ambassdor--he was known to rant or ramble something at a previous or subsequent HSPI event, or something worse, who knows--the bastard is known for having cowardly shot people in the back we know that much. But freeze-framing it and looking at the security entorage's reaction to Hasan at that exact moment may be interesting to note.

...and I think the choice of the BDU's bespeaks (ok, with hindsight) that he wanted trusted access as part of his test of this event. The BDUs seem to me to paint with an, "I'm part of the group carrying the load for us Americans in the ME, so you can trust me" message.

And conversely, if he had plans to assassinate the ambassador, he would have been captured immediately (if not killed)--with CSpan/journalists with cameras there, what kind of image would that have sent Israel and the rest of the world, an AMERICAN *soldier* doing the killing?

YOu’ll notice that at the end the emcee advises all to stay seated.

The terrorist waits a few seconds and then pops up out of his seat...you again, here, “please stay seated”.

Muzzies play by their own rules...interesting he wore his uniform to give himself a sense of legitimacy. Let Israeli Secret Service be forewarned that our military is not to be trusted.

Hasan's motionlessness as the questioner beside him spoke bespeaks some form of uncomfortability and/or training.

At minimum, he was umcomfortable because she was a woman, and not keeping quiet.