Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts

Every single story I have read on FR about soft tissue being found in ancient fossils comes from a Creationist site.
This means one of two things.

1. The creationists are the only ones willing to share raw data and let the chips fall where they may.
2. The creationist sites are batsh** crazy.

I’m honestly not sure which is true, but I am tending to lean towards number one at this point.

There is a third option: Other sources are just not being reported on FR.


48 posted on 11/09/2009 1:24:22 PM PST by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy

Let’s just say that the evos aren’t nearly as excited to get this story out as creationists are. Initially the evos tried to make a case for dino soft-tissue being an illusion created by contamination. But, this has since been laid to rest, as the following National Geographic article makes clear:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090501-oldest-dinosaur-proteins.html


52 posted on 11/09/2009 1:48:38 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson