Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: J. Neil Schulman
Contrast this with libertarian author Brad Linaweaver, who told me he considers American soldiers being armed for protection even more important than the arming of police.

Here's a news flash, senior officers don't like the idea of all of their subordinates being armed virtually at all times.

When I went to boot camp we drilled with demilled Garands and were only given a picture of a 1911 .45 at the pistol range. That was the extent of my weapons training.

On base or deployed even the bosun's would catch sh*t for a larger than issued marlin spike.

The officer corps and the civilians in charge don't give a f*ck if you are able to protect yourself, they just want you to obey.

17 posted on 11/09/2009 1:09:23 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AreaMan

“The officer corps and the civilians in charge don’t give a f*ck if you are able to protect yourself, they just want you to obey.”

A great big F*ckin’ BRAVO SIERRA on that. I carry every day, I would rather EVERYBODY who works for me and for whose security I’m responsible were carrying a weapon AT ALL TIMES. I carry in church, at the courthouse, at high school football games - everywhere. It’s easier for me than for some, because I have the class of CHL that lets me do so, but everybody ought to know how to shoot and be prepared to do so.

Can I assume your military service, for which I thank you, was immediately post-Vietnam?

Colonel, USAFR
2 AF Small Arms Expert Marksman ribbons (M9 and M38)
1 Navy Expert Rifleman ribbon (M16)


25 posted on 11/09/2009 1:25:02 PM PST by jagusafr (Kill the red lizard, Lord! - nod to C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson