Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LifeComesFirst

Well, they pretty much neglected to tell pro-lifers (the folks who send them millions of dollars annually) that the amendment they were threatening Republicans into supporting wasn’t pro-life.

Whoops.


12 posted on 11/11/2009 8:31:57 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Partisans only for principle. - America's Independent Party - AIPNews.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
That graphic you posted is a disingenuous piece of agitprop against the amendment and those who voted for it.

Though the amendment was not comprehensive enough to strip the underlying bill of all its problems, the amendment itself was 100% pro-life. Sarah Palin, Ron Paul, Michelle Bachmann, Steve King...all supported this amendment.

Judie Brown's original problem with the amendment was that it left rape and incest exceptions intact. These are the same exceptions allowed under the Hyde Amendment.

Good luck getting Americans to eliminate rape and incest exceptions before they give up other abortions of convenience.

Not sure why Judie has changed her tune now that the amendment has passed (no risk of Judie being blamed for its failure), and now that the FI$CAL-minded folks have gotten so upset with NRTL. Really, I have no idea.

14 posted on 11/12/2009 3:46:00 AM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson