Posted on 11/13/2009 5:18:49 AM PST by From The Deer Stand
David Gregory, in a report on Sarah Palin on the Today Show, was in a discussion with Meredith Viera and was quick to point out a poll that showed Sarah Palin "wasn't qualified to be vice president." Gregory, of course, didn't note that Palin had more experience than our Obama, our current president. So, if Sarah isn't qualified to be vice-president, where does that leave Obama? More media hype trying to discredit Sarah, who obviouisly is a huge threat to Liberaltown.
The poor people who witnessed these two morons yapping like they know something deserve reparations.
Remind me again what either Gregory or Viera are qualified to do? ;-)
A poll decides whether someone is qualified? At best a poll shows whether people THINK that someone is qualified.
Effed up liberal BS logic.
Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Stupid.................
Even after 9+ months of On The Job Training, the usurper in chief, 0Dumbo, is proving daily that he is not qualified.
Just imagining those two talking to each other about politics...geez, what a snore!
Obammie the Commie STILL has less executive experience than Sarah Palin.
Did anyone here think Obama was qualified in 2008? Because Palin does have less experience holding major elected office than Obama did when he was the democrats’ nominee.
That is ‘propagandistic arguement’, a meme, that all LIBS are continuing to perpetuate. A falsehood that can’t be defined, and hope that the public swallows it. It worked to some degree during SARAH’s intro to the campaign, but only because of the way the McCain campaign’s “FUMBLERS” handled her and kept he under-wraps where she couldn’t provide a true picture of herself.
I believe that once she starts to now become known to the public, and projects her own image and understanding of how she will be if she became President, it will cease to be a credible arguement (not withstanding the fact that the RAT propagandists will continue to hammer away on the meme).
How dare Sarah Palin even consider running for president. After all, she isn’t an Ivy League-educated lawyer. I doubt very seriously if she knows anything at all about community organizing and how to register the dead to vote. Sheesh, the nerve of that woman.
they’re qualified to run a lemonade stand, that’s about it.
Don’t forget Andrea Mitchell, characterizing Palin’s book tour as revenge. Snarky to the extreme.
Are you equating legislative experience with executive experience? The two are not the same. As Governor, Palin had to make decisions that affected thousands. She didn't get a do-over on those decision. She didn't have the luxury of voting 'Present' instead. Compare that with a legislator who has the safety of deflecting blame to everyone else. A legislator can re-write the record if they make a bonehead comment on the Senate floor. And a legislator never ever ever has to make any kind of management decision whatsoever. Come to think of it, a shift manager at McDonalds has more executive responsibility than a US Senator.
Andrea Mitchell? Holy cow I haven’t thought of her in years. She should be a hostess on the Home Shopping Network, she’s horrible.
If you count “major elected” experience as occasionally voting “present” in the US Senate, then maybe you are correct.
While I am not rabid fan of Palin’s, I wonder who these two think they are? I guess the next time I have to hire someone, I will give them a yell and find out if they are “qualified” since they have appointed themselves the “deciders” of who is and is not qualified.
Hard to imagine two more unintelligent people discussing anything, let alone qualifications for public office.
sw
In November 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than Barack Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.