Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kjo
The question in my mind has always been...why the second bomb? As least...why the second bomb so soon after the first?

We were ready to use the second and last bomb in our inventory in case the Japanese didn't believe that we couldn't have any more bombs and "called our bluff."

As it turned out, had they called our bluff for the second time, they would have been right.

IMO, it was the right decision to use two bombs to convince the Japanese that the cost of not surrendering could have inflicted eventual annihilation.

41 posted on 11/15/2009 7:23:23 AM PST by melancholy (Hey Marxists, don't Crap & Tread on me. Zer0's defeat is now in progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: melancholy

Not saying you’re wrong...I’m wondering if we’d announced that we’d use a second bomb if the Japanese didn’t surrender within a few days...if maybe they might have.

We’ll never know...but I’m not sure Nagasaki was necessay...what?...four days after Hiroshima?

Truman was essentially right...that Obama would not know this is AMAZING.


46 posted on 11/15/2009 7:43:21 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson