Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC to Obama: No You Won't
Townhall.com ^ | November 15, 2009 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 11/15/2009 5:47:11 AM PST by Kaslin

The Obama administration grossly underestimated the response of the American people in it's decision to try war-field combatants as common thieves in criminal courts handed down this week by Attorney General Holder. The American people were also not impressed that President Obama ducked responsibility in calling it a "prosecutorial" decision. The American people see the waste that these trials will be, and the harm they could generate by allowing them to proceed. Yet if all these things are true of Americans at large, the residents of NYC realize them in greater magnification.

Realizing that any criminal proceedings to move forward would take place on the same 13 by 2 mile island where the single biggest act of war against our nation was ever committed, New Yorkers feel strongly that such enemy combatants, taken directly off the battlefields, should never be afforded Miranda and other rights associated with being citizens of the United States.

President Obama and Attorney General Holder have also grossly mistaken the ferocity with which this case will bubble up and that the inevitable media circus that will ensue will doom the welfare of America in multiple ways.

These trial proceedings will reopen the still mending emotional, psychological, and physical wounds of 9/11. In deciding with such reckless abandon to make a political pay-off to the far left, and the radical Islamic sympathizers they ignorantly embolden, President Obama is ripping the stitches out of the hearts of those that have wondered if closure will ever come. When the Attorney General promises court room cameras and complete transparency of the proceedings, he seems to ignore the possibility of radicals on camera shouting inaudible commands, jibes, and insults at those in the room as well as those sitting in caves across the globe.

The proceedings will create a bulls-eye again specifically on the most attractive target in America, and be used as an on-going tool of recruitment. Without question, terrorists may have been upset over the treatment of their colleagues at Gitmo, but striking back at the base was a logistical impossibility. Not so with a city of endless train and subway tubes, elevator shafts, a metro area with a nuclear reactor only miles away, and an island that could be isolated and brought to a halt given the right combination of carnage and chaos.

The proceedings are an unnecessary move on the part of the administration to try these particular four terrorists at all. They have all confessed, and even bragged, on the record, of their exploits and parts played in the single worst moment in America's history. With on-the-record confessions, the seeking of the death penalty was insured through military tribunal. What New Yorkers are now left with after the administration's move are mere words that Holder will "seek" the death penalty. And President Obama added his "assurance" that they would receive "the most exacting form of justice" possible. Yet if that was a foregone conclusion, why must he give assurances?

The proceedings are a not-so-veiled attempt to continue to throw negative attention on to the previous administration. In a move that gives birth to crass classlessness, the real endgame of this matter is to reveal military and intelligence secrets for the public and our enemies to judge for themselves as to their legitimate use. The goal of Attorney General Holder in essence becomes the beginning of the re-election campaign for President Barack Obama, and to create a way for George Bush to still be part of the discussion when the trial finally becomes a reality two to three years from now.

The proceedings are also a move that spends enormous amounts of money in an era where we have none extra to spend. The process for each of these four terrorists now begins all over again. Discovery, testimony, evidence that has all been worked and diligently put in place for dealing with enemy combatants taken in acts of war from the battlefield must now be sifted through a different standard. Depending on the political leanings of the judge assigned the case, it is even likely that many gaps will be left in the evidence path, and thus a jury will be instructed not to consider certain sections of otherwise admissible evidence.

I am hesitant to believe that even the Obama administration with all of it's harshest left leanings would genuinely and truly want the mastermind and associates of 9/11 to ever walk free. But that possibility exists.

When O.J. Simpson was found innocent, they had his blood, mixed with Nicole Brown Simpson's on the scene, and in trails from one room to the next. And yet he walked. Should a similar outcome occur in this case, it would not shock me if we as tax-payers would be responsible for the cost of transporting them to their jihadist homelands where they go right back to work attempting to strike America again.

The average New Yorker understands all of this, as does easily the average American.

They also clearly see that President Obama and his minions like Holder are willing to play games with national security in order to make a pandering play to the minimalist base that still supports them strongly.

This travesty will not sit well in New York elections in 2010 and 2012 and unless President Obama decides to make a move that concedes these basic concerns as legitimate by those who lost the most in our nation's worst nightmare, he best consider the consequences.

New York City may be a town of liberals, but even we New Yorkers, in large numbers, on the issue of national security are willing to set aside many other concerns to insure the safety of our nation and our children. And along those lines Congressman Peter King pledges to fight with all his might for the next 45 days to overturn this amazing mistake by what can now easily be seen as the most arrogant administration ever.

One last parting note needs to be tucked in the back of the minds of the Obama administration, even if it doesn't give them much comfort.

I wonder what a Democratic Presidential Primary candidate in 2012 by the name of Hillary Clinton will have to say to her fellow New Yorkers about such a wrong-headed and utterly foolish gesture.

Stay the course Mr. President, and we might just get an answer to that question.


TOPICS: Editorial; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2009 5:47:11 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What are New York liberals saying about this?


2 posted on 11/15/2009 5:49:57 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Godspeed, T, on your fourth tour of duty in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“The proceedings will create a bulls-eye again specifically on the most attractive target in America, and be used as an on-going tool of recruitment....

Yeah, recruitment by Sarah Palin, Mark Steyn, and Glenn Beck.

Absolutely brilliant, Mr President!


3 posted on 11/15/2009 5:51:09 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Maybe NYer’s should have thought more about national security before casting their vote last November.


4 posted on 11/15/2009 5:51:13 AM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
When O.J. Simpson was found innocent, they had his blood, mixed with Nicole Brown Simpson's on the scene, and in trails from one room to the next. And yet he walked.

And Simpson was given his Miranda rights. These bozos surely were not. If they are given full Constitutional rights, they will walk. This is an unbelievably stupid decision on the Administration's part. Obama is a living, breathing disaster.

5 posted on 11/15/2009 5:52:38 AM PST by KevinB (Those who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either being made.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

Yup. A lot have no clue. As long as the little marxists get rent control apts they would vote for Bin Laden - er... well they did. I know people who moved out afterwards because they were afraid.


6 posted on 11/15/2009 5:54:04 AM PST by Frantzie (Judge David Carter - democrat & dishonorable Marine like John Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The proceedings are a not-so-veiled attempt to continue to throw negative attention on to the previous administration. ...the real endgame... is to reveal military and intelligence secrets for the public and our enemies to judge for themselves as to their legitimate use. The goal of Attorney General Holder in essence becomes the beginning of the re-election campaign for President Barack Obama, and to create a way for George Bush to still be part of the discussion when the trial finally becomes a reality...

See my tagline.

7 posted on 11/15/2009 5:54:10 AM PST by Albion Wilde (Obama makes Bush his blame czar. --Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I generally agree with the author’s POV, but this is one of the most poorly written articles I’ve ever read.


8 posted on 11/15/2009 5:54:36 AM PST by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I just hope our country can survive this administration. Their aim is to destroy our country as we know it. My exasperation meter is on overload. Every living, breathing freedom lover better know that our only chance of surviving these Marxist thugs is the congressional elections next November.


9 posted on 11/15/2009 5:54:44 AM PST by demkicker (Helping Democrats Become Extinct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Guilty as sin, free as a bird, What a country.”

Maybe they will walk, get jobs as professors and buy homes in Hyde Park. Maybe they won’t like New York as much as they like Chicago.


10 posted on 11/15/2009 5:55:20 AM PST by Kay Syrah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

Obama wants them to walk. No other reason to do this.


11 posted on 11/15/2009 5:55:38 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

“What are New York liberals saying about this”?

...this will send some of the libtards in NY over the edge. Practically every resident has a personal connection to 9/11.


12 posted on 11/15/2009 5:55:48 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I wish I didn’t know know what I didn’t know then. . . . . .


13 posted on 11/15/2009 5:57:36 AM PST by DeaconRed (Congress: Too Much Monkey Business. BO:Too Much Monkey screwing up business-F.U.B.O.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“These trial proceedings will reopen the still mending emotional, psychological, and physical wounds of 9/11.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emPWG9iK-10&feature=related

Raw Footage:Low Flying Planes panic NYC public


No one makes this “mistake” twice.


14 posted on 11/15/2009 5:58:24 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Give your reasons.


15 posted on 11/15/2009 5:59:20 AM PST by Running On Empty ((The three sorriest words:"It's too late"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

awww am i supposed to feel bad for NYers now
sorry vote R and turn NY into a red state other than that NY gets what it deserves


16 posted on 11/15/2009 5:59:21 AM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obie the mooslem is “in your face” with us infidels.


17 posted on 11/15/2009 6:00:05 AM PST by exnavy (GOD save the republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

What are New York liberals saying about this?
__________________________________________________

Whatever is devoid of all logic and reason, no doubt.


18 posted on 11/15/2009 6:00:08 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (I don't have a 'Cousin Pookie'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

It’s very clear this decision is well calculated whose objective is NOT to put KSM on trial but rather expose Bush & America as war criminals. Since NYC is a mecca of Alinsky communists, NYC is the perfect venue to expose these “war criminals”.


19 posted on 11/15/2009 6:00:15 AM PST by newfreep ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
Pretty good bet that the defense will argue that a jury of their “peers” will be 100% Muslin. The striking is going to be a circus.
20 posted on 11/15/2009 6:01:56 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson