Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat

Yep. As I said in subsequent posts, a “tidal wave” is what she would need to win. If 2012 turns out to be a nailbiter (like say 2004) with Obama hovering in the 45-50% approve range I think there is no way she wins. Obama’s approval has to be way down for her to win (I’d wager at least under 40%).

Personally I’m not comfortable having criticized Senator Obama for a dearth of experience and then nominate one who hasn’t much if any more (and having resigned too). Consistency matters.


106 posted on 11/16/2009 4:49:43 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Norman Bates

Personally I’m not comfortable having criticized Senator Obama for a dearth of experience and then nominate one who hasn’t much if any more (and having resigned too). Consistency matters.

Well you should know that “experience” isn’t that important. Afterall, you did run the McCain List “common sense conservatism” from the moment he announced. So experience can be beaten. You should know more than most.


108 posted on 11/16/2009 4:53:10 PM PST by rbmillerjr (It's us against them...the Establishment RINOs vs rank and file...Sarah Palin or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson