To: Ira_Louvin
I thought that perhaps random mutations were mutations that occured randomly.
So a neutral mutation occured. But somehow, while offering no selective advantage, came to predominate in the offspring. Then other neutral mutations occured, each one individually offering no selective advantage, but also came to predominate in the DNA. But then the neutral mutations came together and built a better mousetrap. Is that it?
24 posted on
11/16/2009 8:18:23 PM PST by
Mudtiger
To: Mudtiger
Nice attempt at a straw man
25 posted on
11/16/2009 8:21:14 PM PST by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
To: Mudtiger
It’s amazing that you follow/believe/worship a man that says God is most probably dead.
28 posted on
11/16/2009 8:28:11 PM PST by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: Mudtiger
So a neutral mutation occurred. But somehow, while offering no selective advantage, came to predominate in the offspring. Then other neutral mutations occurred, each one individually offering no selective advantage, but also came to predominate in the DNA. But then the neutral mutations came together and built a better mousetrap. Is that it?Yup! You got it. Seems simple enough. I can buy that. Kind of like... various parts randomly show up in a junkyard. They just keep showing up; more and more of them. And then one day a tornado comes through and, whallah! A DC-10 is formed! Why does anyone have trouble believing this?
139 posted on
11/18/2009 9:43:06 PM PST by
70times7
(Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson