Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breast exam guidelines now call for less testing (beginning of rationing?)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/16/AR2009111602822.html ^

Posted on 11/17/2009 6:29:38 AM PST by chessplayer

Women in their 40s should stop routinely having annual mammograms and older women should cut back to one scheduled exam every other year, an influential federal task force has concluded, challenging the use of one of the most common medical tests.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2009 6:29:38 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

And so it begins.


2 posted on 11/17/2009 6:31:14 AM PST by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Actually, I have a friend in the mammography field, and they’re discovering that by irradiating women’s breasts so often, they might actually be *causing* some of the cancer that they’re trying to prevent. She’s been railing against the frequency of the tests for years. Apparently they’ve finally decided to slow down the number of tests in order to study it a bit more. Thank goodness, I say!


3 posted on 11/17/2009 6:34:48 AM PST by angeliquemb9 (Jaded with regard to our leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

I kind of wondered about that myself. I thought preventative medicine was the way to go to reduce costs.....

hh


4 posted on 11/17/2009 6:35:02 AM PST by hoosier hick (Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

Volunteerism ? (just kidding)


5 posted on 11/17/2009 6:35:16 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I’m not qualified to give an opinion on the validity of the recommendations, but the trouble with ObamaCare is that it raises the question in my mind (and in millions of others, no doubt) of whether this is based on sound medical reasoning, or simply financial considerations.


6 posted on 11/17/2009 6:35:42 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

So much for “preventative medicine” in the context of cost savings.


7 posted on 11/17/2009 6:36:23 AM PST by Kimberly GG (Sarah Palin - Supports a "path to citizenship" for illegal aliens. "path to citizenship" IS AMNESTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Actually, in all honestly, I can point you to articles from 5 years ago stating that they should be stopped, they don’t help, and actually harm the breast, this is not an Obama thing ...


8 posted on 11/17/2009 6:37:11 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

This may be the most blatant example of Orwellian “double think” yet. For years we’ve heard nothing other than “early detection” and earlier and more frequent testing.

Now, on a dime - the advice is absolutely reversed.

What’s next ?

Smoking as preventative health?


9 posted on 11/17/2009 6:38:22 AM PST by crescen7 (game on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
I listened to the speeches by "the experts". Boy, I bet Obama gives them a big raise in their next paycheck...They almost sounded like they were convinced themselves of this recommendation.

I'm waiting for the other shoe....the one that says "If you want it earlier, you pay for it..unless you're black, hispanic...or a terrorist.

10 posted on 11/17/2009 6:41:32 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
I can point you to articles from 5 years ago stating that they should be stopped

Perhaps so, but my point is that EVERYTHING is now more dubious because there is potentially another reason behind it.

11 posted on 11/17/2009 6:42:45 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: angeliquemb9; Scythian

There is no explanation for telling women not to bother with self-exams. Could it be that part of rationing care means delaying treatment as well?

To think these study results were not influenced by the bottom line mentality defies belief, IMO.


12 posted on 11/17/2009 6:48:38 AM PST by workerbee (If you vote for Democrats, you are engaging in UnAmerican Activity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: angeliquemb9

Agreed, yearly mammograms increase breast cancer risk by 1-3%, meaning 10 years of them increases risk by 10%.

Women should consider alternatives, such as THERMOGRAMS.


13 posted on 11/17/2009 7:01:05 AM PST by pitviper68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I know of women in their 30’s who have died of breast cancer. I don’t see how this will help prevent that.


14 posted on 11/17/2009 7:03:04 AM PST by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

This is the set-up for medical care rationing for the serfs that will be forced into govt run treatment centers. We have to accomodate all the illegals that will receive the same care while the politicians will receive the care for the nobles. If we, as taxpayers, sit back and tolerate this tyranny you can bet more is to come.


15 posted on 11/17/2009 7:05:10 AM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Freedom's Precious Metals: Gold, Silver and Lead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

16 posted on 11/17/2009 7:17:44 AM PST by maddog55 (The enemy is domestic and it's the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

When breast examines are rationed, women will have their breasts examined by seedy characters in back rooms operating outside the law.


17 posted on 11/17/2009 7:18:05 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Maybe it’s time for me to consider a career change.


18 posted on 11/17/2009 7:32:53 AM PST by Notary Sojac ("Goldman Sachs" is to "US economy" as "lamprey" is to "lake trout")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

And I want those women, the good ones, to know that I am there for them.


19 posted on 11/17/2009 7:33:39 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
I have been doing self exams since 1980 when my mother was diagnosed with breast cancer. I did my monthly self exam in Dec. 2004 and found an area that seemed to be thicker than the surrounding area. I had a mammogram in Feb 2005 and it was clear. I called my OBGYN and told her that I wanted more tests. She was reluctant but agreed since I had a rather strong family history of breast cancer. I lost my mother, an aunt and two first cousins to breast cancer.

I had a breast biopsy in March 2005 which indicated that I had invasive lobular cancer. The cancer was the size of an egg. My radiologist told me that lobular breast cancer is 15% of the breast cancers and does not show up on a mammogram. He also said that looking for cancer with a mammogram on women with dense and or large breasts is like looking for a snowman in a blizzard.

I cannot imagine why anyone would say breast self exams are not necessary. I am not sure that I would still be here if I had not made a habit of examining my breasts. Libby

20 posted on 11/17/2009 7:34:23 AM PST by libbytarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson