[so_real]

Good. At least she'll have "standing". The defendant always has standing. Wonder if that idiot judge said something in his diatribe that would circumspectly open a can of worms for the pres--ent.

[Non-Sequitur]

Good. At least she'll have "standing". The defendant always has standing. Wonder if that idiot judge said something in his diatribe that would circumspectly open a can of worms for the pres--ent.

Standing to do what?

[SvenMagnussen]

“Wonder if that idiot judge said something in his diatribe that would circumspectly open a can of worms for the pres—ent.”

Yes! After Taitz filed a motion to reconsider, the plaintiff, Rhodes, attempted to contact the court to object to the filing.

Instead of advising the plaintiff to contact her attorney and inform her of plaintiff’s demand to cease and desist, the Clerk of the Court began negotiating with the plaintiff to file a motion with the court. The Clerk of the Court knew the plaintiff was represented by an attorney. The only appropriate response would have been to instruct the plaintiff to contact her representative (Taitz).

The Clerk of the Court stepped in it further by contacting the US Attorney’s office and informing him of plaintiff’s ex-parte communications with the Court.

When this is over, it will be a laundry list of ethics violations against Judge Land and the US Attorney’s office.