No.
Or did you ever think of checking with creationists themselves instead of accepting a biased take on something?
No, because checking with Creationists means going to a committed, doctrine-biased source.
Like evos aren’t?
You haven’t been following these threads very carefully then.
So, you’re not willing to check with creationists themselves about what they think.
Instead you’ll take the word of someone who disparages and scorns what he thinks they believe?
How do you expect to get an accurate representation of what creationists believe if you take only second hand rumor and innuendo from a biased source?