Just like evos do. Someone disagrees with evolution and posts information that they believe supports their point of view and they get slammed with pejoratives like *Liar for the Lord* and *Liars for Jesus*, at least until the mods smack them down and threaten banning if it continues.
That's essentially the only reason the evos stopped that one.
And there is the standard accusation of projection. Starting with some assertion that the creationists have better argments than the evolutionists do, any critical examination of those arguments is simply answered with accusations that "the evoes do it too". So where's the difference? There's certainly never going to be any critical examination of the arguments on their merits.