Why don’t you give some specific examples? Maybe I can assist your comprehension, which, realistically, seems quite limited. By the way, do you have any substantive comments? Your position seems to be that the law is determined by whether or not an attorney emulates the style of Ernest Hemeingway. That does not seem the position of one with much substantive comprehension. I aaked you a substantive question and you did not answer. What do you maintain is patriotic on your part when you offer apologetics for constitutional fraud? Is it you think that it is okay to violate the Constitution with impunity?
OK, assist me in understanding what a “leave of case” is.