Her propensity to speak in long, run-on sentences is highly distracting. She’s got the right ideas, but she’s the wrong messenger.
___________________________________________________________
If she speaks in long, run-on sentences that are highly distracting why is it that so many people are touched by her message?
The average person that hears long run-on sentences that annoy them turns the speaker off and doesn’t hear the message. So how would you explain the many folks that say she speaks in a homey, forthright manner? Or the hundreds of thousands that turned out at her rallies because they felt she was speaking to them? Drill baby drill ~ hmmm, long? run-on?
You obviously don’t like her and that’s fine, we’re all entitled to our opinions, but if she truly was that pathetic a speaker she would NOT attract the crowds she does nor would thousands of people line up and sleep out over night to get a book signed. I didn’t see people doing that for Hildebeast’s book nor Pelosi’s.
—”So how would you explain the many folks that say she speaks in a homey, forthright manner? “
So did Bush and he wasn’t able to articulate a message that sank in with the voters.
We lost the election in part because Bush couldn’t convince people and defend himself verbally. Reagan could do so, Palin will not.
Don’t get me wrong because I was enthralled with Palin for the first few days after McCain chose her...