[Terpfen]

Since they are subbing real temp data after 1960, isn’t this fraud?

From what I can tell, they're using the "fake but accurate" defense, claiming that even if the numbers have been manipulated it's because the original data was wrong and needed to be changed to reflect "true" findings, which coincidentally happens to support global warming.

[dila813]

I keep seeing that in all the emails.

The models are right and the observations are wrong.

What a kooky idea, the only people fooled was themselves.