You mean they were hiding the lack of warming in the proxy data which means their models are crap.
The instrumental record does show warming.
The whole deck of cards human induced warming is built on though (along with the predictions of coming doom) is that the proxy data predicts future warming that hasn’t happened.
I think this is the core of this lie.
Proxy data doesn’t match the observed temperatures and therefore models are crap and model predictions of global warming in the future are crap.
The models have always been crap. I feel sorry for all the real scientists that were systematically ostracized by these aholes.
One in particular comes to mind from reading all these emails...David Legates.
I hope Dr. Legates feels vindicated now.
In this context, what exactly does "proxy data" mean?