there arent any credible data that can be shared and then improved by feedback. Just look at the harry_readme.txt file it chronicles some poor guys attempts to do just that improve the data, flying by the seats of his pants. At some point, he declares it impossible:
You cant imagine what this has cost me to actually allow the operator to assign false WMO codes!! But what else is there in such situations? Especially when dealing with a Master database of dubious provenance (which, er, they all are and always will be).
So with a somewhat cynical shrug, I added the nuclear option In other words, what CRU usually do. It will allow bad databases to pass unnoticed, and good databases to become bad, but I really dont think people care enough to fix em "
This is malfeasance of epic proportions. Phil Jones knows it his specific input into this work is mentioned in several places and tries to hide it. Only choice if he wants to keep his job.Now he may experience some unprecedented warming in both hemispheres (© commenter Phil on Bishop Hills blog).