[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Have you ever seen how wikipedia.org quashes every change that does not adhere to the Church of Global Warming dogma? Surprisingly, there is a new article named "Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident." It's kind of entertaining to see what mental gymnastics the "orthodox" posters go through. Or maybe this guy is being sarcastic?

Scientists hiding data? Bah, that's like the ridiculous canard that journals were pressured not to publish critical articles. I can't think where people get these goofy ideas. Tom Harrison Talk 18:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Tom: How about from the emails themselves(presuming they are legit, and this isn't the only one in the archive that discusses hiding or ignoring FOI requests. Bellis (talk) 22:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, yeah, there is that, but it doesn't count because it's stolen, and copyrighted, and taken out of context, and probably made up by global warming deniers conspiring with Big Oil to make the scientists look bad. Plus, it's forbidden to link or quote that on Wikipedia, so it doesn't really exist anyway. So there. Tom Harrison Talk 22:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

From the Wikipedia link......

***********************************EXCERPT************************************

The CRU has in the past put non public data on the public side of its servers.

The previous "leak" in July 2009 turned out to have been done by the director of the CRU while fighting a FOI request by Steve McIntyre.