Thanks again.
OK, another question. Why do we have one set of temperature readings (not tree ring measurements) that say it’s getting warmer since 1998, and another that says it’s not getting warmer?
Yoou surely aren't implying that the second set of measurements came from the CRU ?
I am assuming that you are talking about satellite vs land based and ocean based readings.
That is easily explainable but raises a question we should ask.
Why when we know satellite readings are more accurate do they continue to use land and ocean based readings in their data?
Because the satellite readings are cooler.
Fraud!
All they had to do was share the BS data with someone, then they unknowingly become part of the conspiracy.