Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dila813

Thanks again.

OK, another question. Why do we have one set of temperature readings (not tree ring measurements) that say it’s getting warmer since 1998, and another that says it’s not getting warmer?


79 posted on 11/24/2009 2:13:15 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Joe Wilson said "You lie!" in a room full of 500 politicians. Who was he talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
and another that says it’s not getting warmer?

Yoou surely aren't implying that the second set of measurements came from the CRU ?

83 posted on 11/24/2009 6:50:51 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

I am assuming that you are talking about satellite vs land based and ocean based readings.

That is easily explainable but raises a question we should ask.

Why when we know satellite readings are more accurate do they continue to use land and ocean based readings in their data?

Because the satellite readings are cooler.

Fraud!


85 posted on 11/24/2009 8:21:53 AM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

All they had to do was share the BS data with someone, then they unknowingly become part of the conspiracy.


86 posted on 11/24/2009 8:22:47 AM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson