Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Marietta GA City) Council reviews 'So Help Me God' oath
www.mdjonline.com ^ | 11/22/09 | Jon Gillooly

Posted on 11/23/2009 5:43:48 AM PST by Bulldawg Fan

MARIETTA - City Councilman Van Pearlberg objected this week to the phrase "So help me God" included in the oath of office that Marietta police officers are required to say.

Pearlberg, a senior assistant district attorney, said it's been his experience that when citizens take the stand from time to time, making them swear to God can be a problem.

"A lot of people won't swear on a Bible. Their religious beliefs won't allow them to swear," Pearlberg said.

(Excerpt) Read more at mdjonline.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: amazing
The culture wars are in full swing, even in the deep South. I hope this Van Pearlberg hears from the residents of Marietta and others to express their objections too. How does human debris make it to this point?
1 posted on 11/23/2009 5:43:50 AM PST by Bulldawg Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan
But liberals have no problem with "Allahu Akbar!" Go figure.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

2 posted on 11/23/2009 5:46:30 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

If you can’t swear to God in Georgia, we are in more trouble than I thought.


3 posted on 11/23/2009 5:50:14 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

Oh for cryin out loud.


4 posted on 11/23/2009 5:51:54 AM PST by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan
Van Pearlberg

Remember this name. He'll make a great Democrat candidate for something. His rise will be meteoric.

5 posted on 11/23/2009 5:52:38 AM PST by IbJensen (America being militarily and economically strong isn't enough: We must be morally strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

I got an idea....

If you got a problem with God, give us our money back because “In God We Trust” is on every piece of money we make.

Y’all can donate it to me.


6 posted on 11/23/2009 5:53:11 AM PST by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“But liberals have no problem with “Allahu Akbar!” Go figure. “

I figured it out just fine. The man is scum!


7 posted on 11/23/2009 5:55:39 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan
The first sentence mentions police officer oaths while the second sentence refers to citizens on the stand, presumably in court. Its the citizens that he states has oath problems, but the solution put forth is to change how the police take an oath? Seems a bit of bait-and-switch going on.

Anyways, nobody is forced to swear on the bible to be a police officer. They are perfectly free to be a cabbie or haul trash. They could even be a doctor (if they don't mind taking the hippocratic oath).

8 posted on 11/23/2009 5:59:47 AM PST by C210N (A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Maybe my interpretation is wrong, but doesn’t the Bible even say in Matthew 5:34-37 not to swear to God?

“But I tell you, Do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. Simply let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.

I have always thought this meant one should not swear to God. But I had never thought about this with relation to swearing into court till just now.


9 posted on 11/23/2009 6:05:07 AM PST by Drrdot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

If you can’t swear to God in Georgia, we are in more trouble than I thought.

***

Chances are this clown originally came from some Northern state.

My husband and I visited SC last spring for the first time. We were in the Myrtle Beach area, and I was astounded by the large number of NY transplants there. Explains a lot about liberal swings going on in that state. Sad.


10 posted on 11/23/2009 6:11:25 AM PST by Bigg Red (Palin/Hunter 2012 -- Bolton their Secretary of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Drrdot
I had always understood that to mean swearing when you're dealing with ordinary folks -- the sort of casual swearing that takes place in business, like, "Honest to God, this is the best little used car . . . "

Swearing by ones head is that sort of swearing, as you can see if you read the Arabian Nights.

Taking an oath to tell the truth in a court of law is quite another thing. And taking a solemn oath that you really mean occurs throughout the Bible, and St. Paul refers to it favorably in the letter to the Hebrews, Ch. 6, v. 16-17: "For men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife. Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath."

That of course has not stopped Quakers and others from taking their own interpretation of the Bible to mean that they cannot swear an oath in a court of law. But St. Paul also said that "the magistrate does not bear the sword in vain". Romans 13:4.

11 posted on 11/23/2009 6:17:10 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

I guess I don’t see the big deal.


12 posted on 11/23/2009 6:32:12 AM PST by Sloth (Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Ok, I see. Thanks for clearing that up for me


13 posted on 11/23/2009 8:07:00 AM PST by Drrdot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson