Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator

I would imagine that a loss of 70% of the reporting stations reduces the large-number theory just a bit; still, any value-added adjustment depends on the value set of the adjuster.

Now that we clearly see that the fraternity of believers are nearly monolithic in that respect, how does that affect your confidence in them?

This is too big to hide; either they start over or they back off and regroup.

Similarly, I think it is time for you to quit hiding behind the shield of authority and look at the whole scheme chronologically.

Science has become addicted to catastrophe as a discipline; where’s the benefit in that?


83 posted on 11/29/2009 9:37:07 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Old Professer; cogitator

http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/gistemp-ushcn-v2-and-the-filter-q-continuum/

Read his comments and agree/disagree before you appeal to the authority of classic statistics, please.


84 posted on 11/29/2009 9:48:45 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson