Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBrow
"He hit himself!"

I'm sure he didn't surrender willingly. When several people are trying to restrain a perp, in this case a terrorist, arms, hands and legs will be flying around. Anyone could get hurt from that. Frankly I could give two $hits if they gave him a bloody lip. They should have beat him to a bloody pulp!!

Today on Rush's show, some former military guy said he heard that these charges were in retaliation for the Navy Seals who failed to follow Obama's rules of engagement in the April shooting of 3 Somali pirates after they took Captain Phillips hostage. I can believe that. Afterall, those shot were muslims, and we all know that Obama has hissy fits when he doesn't get his way.

55 posted on 11/25/2009 11:21:30 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th
"Afterall, those shot were muslims, and we all know that Obama has hissy fits when he doesn't get his way."

And it is clear to me his ass points west and his head points east. Maybe not five times a day. But it may be. In fact is likley.

57 posted on 11/25/2009 11:34:35 PM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: mass55th

“Today on Rush’s show, some former military guy said he heard that these charges were in retaliation for the Navy Seals who failed to follow Obama’s rules of engagement”

Sort of like Obama dissing Gordon Brown because of what some Englishman did to Obama’s Mau Mau granddad. Makes sense. We should have hired an adult for this job.


118 posted on 11/26/2009 6:25:52 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: mass55th
...these charges were in retaliation for the Navy Seals who failed to follow Obama's rules of engagement in the April shooting of 3 Somali pirates after they took Captain Phillips hostage. This is possible, given the underhanded tactics of this administration. However, would it not constitute undue command influence? Y'all in the military know what that means.
135 posted on 11/26/2009 3:19:05 PM PST by ArmyTeach ( Speak the truth, right the wrong, and follow the King.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson