We live in two worlds - The hopeful, thoughtful, wonderful world of MSM, Some Scientists, and our elite politicians on one hand... On the other, common sense, the people, and a precious few new outlets that occupy the other world.
One will survive - one will fall. Since many of the “money makers” are on the left (power and money controls all), the only resource on our side is the truth! Thank goodness that it still rings throughout the countryside...
Another thing to be thankful for; Mark Steyn.
Looking beyond the personally celebrated delight of the CRU collapse and it’s impact on the world politic... up to 12 Australian MP’s resigning...
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100018003/climategate-five-aussie-mps-lead-the-way-by-resigning-in-disgust-over-carbon-tax/
there still is a question regarding the release of the questionable data.
Why? A multi-billion dollar scam just approaching fruition after years and years of withstanding the common-sense assault by citizen and scientist alike self-destructs? I have to wonder.
Who would gain? Does anyone honestly think the forces behind this crashing train are celebrating for the tax slaves who just, through little effort of their own, escaped an all around crushing burden? Where’s the winner?
Yes, yes, I know. George Soros is an easy and obvious target but he also exhibits an exquisite sense of gamesmanship. Some interesting questions are put forth at
http://junkscience.com/ByTheJunkman/20090302.html earlier this year.
An article in October’s Smithsonian magazine about a company named Benetech, http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/Digs-Paper-Trail.html contained information that sounded uncomfortably similar to the following information found at
http://www.soros.org/resources/articles_publications/publications/annual_20070731/a_complete.pdf on page 98.
...OSI is advocating two complementary strategies to
achieve open access to scholarly publications. Both of these strategies can be implemented by scholars who present
their research results to the world without expectation of
payment, and both can be implemented immediately and
without depending upon markets or legislation.
Open access will require new mechanisms to pay for
peer review.
The first strategy is to provide scholars with the tools and assistance they need to deposit their peer-reviewed journal articles in open electronic archives, repositories from which anyone searching the web can retrieve them.
The second is to launch new open access journals and help
develop an open access journal system that is financially
self-sustaining. New open access journals will no longer
invoke copyright to restrict access to the material they
publish; instead, open access journals will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent access, free of charge, to all the articles they publish...
This seemingly disastrous defeat at the last minute of the unstoppable global warming juggernaut has to have a silver lining somewhere. Folks at the Soros level of control just don’t get blind sided.
I’m suggesting that we might expect a well-timed call for a world-wide governing body on data compilation and control fairly soon.
And if you think Open Source Institute doesn’t bear watching go on back to http://www.soros.org/resources/articles_publications/publications/annual_20070731/a_complete.pdf and scroll on down to page 118.