Posted on 11/26/2009 10:53:47 PM PST by RobinMasters
This week, two points in an emerging pointillist picture of a White House leaking supportnot the support of voters, though polls there show steady decline, but in two core constituencies, Washington's Democratic-journalistic establishment, and what might still be called the foreign-policy establishment.
From journalist Elizabeth Drew, a veteran and often sympathetic chronicler of Democratic figures, a fiery denunciation ofand warning forthe White House. In a piece in Politico on the firing of White House counsel Greg Craig, Ms. Drew reports that while the president was in Asia last week, "a critical mass of influential people who once held big hopes for his presidency began to wonder whether they had misjudged the man." They once held "an unromantically high opinion of Obama," and were key to his rise, but now they are concluding that the president isn't "the person of integrity and even classiness they had thought."
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
60 or so posts and no one has said it yet, you guys are slipping. Oh by the way...
“This is not the Barack Obama I know” MSM per Peggy Noonan.
Peggy writes like she’s addicted to belladonna and opium suppositories.
Not an image I particularly needed rattling around my head, thanks.
Peggy, tell me, didn't the "wise men" (and "wise women") enthusiastically support the election of this President?
Now that he is known to be both radical and incompetent, seems to me the "wise men" (and "wise women") are only now catching up with the rest of us common, ordinary people.
So, why should we respect the opinions of these "wise men" (and "wise women")?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.