In all the venom you spouted at people who have dared to criticize a beret-wearing illiterate, Curtis Sliwa, you have not addressed his serial lying - which he admitted in court - and filing false reports with the police.
Balanced readers of this website will notice this and draw the appropriate conclusions.
> In all the venom you spouted at people who have dared to criticize a beret-wearing illiterate, Curtis Sliwa, you have not addressed his serial lying - which he admitted in court - and filing false reports with the police.
The only vituperative in our discussion so far has come from you.
It is not my place to apologize for or explain Curtis Sliwa’s youthful indiscretions. He has already done that, and paid the price for it.
But it is my place to hold you accountable for your indiscretions in our discussion. You have been silent upon being challenged to put-up-or-shut-up.
I take it, then, that you decline my challenge to you to demonstrate what you have done for the betterment of Mankind that allows you to call Curtis Sliwa a “phony”.
In default of a proper answer from you, I conclude that you have done nothing, and that you are all talk and no walk.
There’s only one fair response to that, mate: “It takes a phony to know a phony.”
You have just shredded what little credibility you might have had in this discussion.
Perhaps instead you might like to answer a question, because I am curious: what on earth did Curtis Sliwa ever do to you to make you treat him so disrespectfully?
Did he catch you misbehaving once-upon-a-time and arrest you? Wouldn’t the Guardian Angels let you join? What is it that makes you so bitter-and-twisted about Curtis Sliwa?
Your lack of balance appears so extreme I’ve got to suspect there’s more to it than meets the eye. So please do tell. Enquiring minds want to know..
> Balanced readers of this website will notice this and draw the appropriate conclusions.
Yes, on this we can agree. I am sure they will, and indeed I am sure they have.