Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caddystacks

Interesting reasoning by the author and, I think, right on target. The Republicans need to offer a clear alternative to Obama, regardless who the nominee is. The biggest danger is that the party nominates a lackluster candidate (normal against an incumbent) with Obama-lite views and fails to take advantage of the dynamics in the voter pool.....

hh


22 posted on 12/01/2009 1:22:46 PM PST by hoosier hick (Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hoosier hick
The Republicans need to offer a clear alternative to Obama, regardless who the nominee is.

That's one of the reasons Sarah Palin resonates with folks. She is the walking, talking, total polar opposite to the Kenyan and his warped ideology

30 posted on 12/01/2009 1:36:06 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: hoosier hick

“The biggest danger is that the party nominates a lackluster candidate...”

The biggest problem is if the party nominates an UNTESTED candidate.

After Obama, the voters will be looking for tested and true experience.


47 posted on 12/01/2009 2:37:10 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson