Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wendy1946
You claimed that the recent hadrosaur find was entirely fossilized; that clearly is a false statement.

I'll take a pass on what I'm sure would be a satisfying discussion about whether a few molecules in the rock means something is "not entirely fossilized." I may have overstated the case; it's hard to tell from the several writeups I checked.

Nevertheless we're left with rock containing a few organic molecules and "cellular components" for dinosaurs, versus dry leather and edible meat for mammoths. Do you have an explanation, or are you too stupid to realize that it's obvious you're running away from the question?

147 posted on 12/03/2009 8:00:27 AM PST by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

The explanation is simple enough. The mammoth died approximately 3500 years ago and the dinosaur more like 5000 - 50000.


149 posted on 12/03/2009 9:12:29 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson