Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good news - both in going mainstream and Congress not sweeping it under a rug!
1 posted on 12/03/2009 9:27:17 AM PST by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: PreciousLiberty

But they had good intentions!


2 posted on 12/03/2009 9:28:43 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

Congress ought to look into the fraudulent use of taxpayer grants to these enviro-cultists. Rush read an email that clearly shows that they were worried that their expensive junkets would expose their misuse of government funding.


3 posted on 12/03/2009 9:30:24 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

Thomas Dolby’s song wasn’t sci-fi after all.

AGW assaults rigorous scientific inquiry with its fuzzy math, after all, and discredits ‘science’ per se by undercutting scientific method.


4 posted on 12/03/2009 9:31:05 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty
Top administration scientists looking at the same thing found no such sign, saying it doesn't change the fact that the world is warming.

Nope. It just means that the warming ISN'T CAUSED BY MANKIND.
5 posted on 12/03/2009 9:31:08 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

I think the mainstream tried to suppress it and Congress with the exception of Inholde(sp?) was afraid to touch it.

But thanks to Al Gore’s invention the story kept spreading until they practically had no choice.


6 posted on 12/03/2009 9:35:12 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

Holdren made the mistake of saying he would divulge all emails and data he had on AGW/Climate Change/Oceanic Acidification. Sensenbrenner told him to expect a lot of letters (requests)


7 posted on 12/03/2009 9:39:21 AM PST by Roccus (My anger IS manufactured.......................................in the WHITE HOUSE and CONGRESS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty
Top administration scientists looking at the same thing found no such sign, saying it doesn't change the fact that the world is warming.

First of all...what the hell is an "administration scientist"? Is that like the king's wizards and alchemists?

Secondly...It is not a fact that "the world is warming". It has been cooling for the last 10 years.

13 posted on 12/03/2009 9:43:24 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty
con•spir•a•cy (kən-spîr'ə-sē) n. pl. con•spir•a•cies An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act. A group of conspirators. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: a conspiracy of wind and tide that devastated coastal areas. [Middle English conspiracie, from Anglo-Norman, probably alteration of Old French conspiration, from Latin cōnspīrātiō, cōnspīrātiōn-, from cōnspīrātus, past participle of cōnspīrāre, to conspire; see conspire.]
14 posted on 12/03/2009 9:43:42 AM PST by 20 years too late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty; All

Could anyone explain to me why the “media” uses pictures of nuclear facilities cooling towers emitting Water Vapor(steam) when they are doing stories on Air Pollution? Sometimes they also use ordinary stacks emitting water vapor. Are they saying water vapor is a pollutant?

There is a difference between smoke and water vapor!


15 posted on 12/03/2009 9:49:43 AM PST by GOYAKLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty; Horusra; Delacon; Thunder90; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; Nervous Tick; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

17 posted on 12/03/2009 9:50:26 AM PST by steelyourfaith (Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty
Science advisers and Obama in the same sentence is a oxymoron.
19 posted on 12/03/2009 9:52:59 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

[[Top administration scientists looking at the same thing found no such sign, saying it doesn’t change the fact that the world is warming.]]

Spin spin spin obama- we’re smarter than you seem to htink we are- and you and your cronies continual spin just keeps proving you have an agenda that doesn’t jive with the evidence-

NOONE is saying the earth didn’t wamr SLIGHTLY (more than a decade ago) What we ARE sayign however is that man is NOT responsible for it, can’t do anythign about it, and you and your cronies have absolutely ZERO evidence proviong man can do sometyhing about it, and we are NOT goign to keep investing money into this ponzi scheme/FRAUD- As well we ARE saying the globe has been cooling for 10 years, and wil lcontinue to cool for another 30 or so due to lack of sun spots- So enough with the assinine spin big O- We’re onto your SCAM/FRAUD, and hte sooner you fess up to it, the more apt peopel are to forgive you for raking usa over hte coals, but the longer you spin this trying to keep the fraud going, them ore people will NOT forgive you!


23 posted on 12/03/2009 10:00:25 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

Thank you for posting this!

I believe all Americans concerned with the Global Warming Fraud should do our part to “warm” America. Burn up the phone lines/email to our elected officials and demand Congressional inquiries into this scandal.

Also stop Cap and Trade since it is based upon “manipulated” science. (Or should I say, MANNipulated science?)


25 posted on 12/03/2009 10:01:41 AM PST by azkathy (OBAMA IS WEARING OUT MY CAPS LOCK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Americans say it’s at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data to support their own theories and beliefs about global warming. Thirty-five percent (35%) say it’s Very Likely.

Just 26% say it’s not very or not at all likely that some scientists falsified data.


27 posted on 12/03/2009 10:04:44 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty
Sensenbrenner said the 2006 National Academy study showed Mann's hockey stick was incorrect and that Mann's theory was discredited. But Holdren said the NAS study had quibbles with Mann's methods but agreed with his results.

From a 2004 MIT study about the hockey stick:

Now comes the real shocker. This improper normalization procedure tends to emphasize any data that do have the hockey stick shape, and to suppress all data that do not. To demonstrate this effect, McIntyre and McKitrick created some meaningless test data that had, on average, no trends. This method of generating random data is called Monte Carlo analysis, after the famous casino, and it is widely used in statistical analysis to test procedures. When McIntyre and McKitrick fed these random data into the Mann procedure, out popped a hockey stick shape!

30 posted on 12/03/2009 10:10:26 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

I am in full favor of piling this story to the highest glacier on Earth.


32 posted on 12/03/2009 10:13:09 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

“Top administration scientists looking at the same thing found no such sign, saying it doesn’t change the fact that the world is warming.”.....

Chicago style politics continues in the White House.....stay tuned.


33 posted on 12/03/2009 10:13:25 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

His science advisors should be grilled, with barbecue sauce, and sent to the Kenyan’s cousin Raul Odinga in Kenya..


35 posted on 12/03/2009 10:18:41 AM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

Republican Congressmen need to get real scientists to ask questions for them, and do the cross examinations of the 0 Organization’s scientists. Climategate needs to be more than an exposure of the global warming scam. It needs to become an exposure of corrupt science and corrupt scientists, and it needs to come with civil and criminal consequences for frauds that have hurt businesses, individuals and communities.


36 posted on 12/03/2009 10:19:16 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PreciousLiberty

But but but.... Facts and evidence do not matter, the charge is so serious such that alone warrants action..

Or words to those effect, used during the “high tech lynching” of Justice Clarence Thomas.


37 posted on 12/03/2009 10:19:28 AM PST by Fred Hayek (From this point forward the Democratic Party will be referred to as the Communist Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson