[Canedawg]

Then you must know that a Hawaiian official who makes an out of court statement that they have seen the document and it is accurate IS hearsay, and violates the best evidence rule.

That doesnt negate citing Wiki (Phil Berg did it too, and I found that to be comical and it detracted from his credibility too) but the main point of these lawsuits is to compel production of the long form BC, and not rely on hearsay statements from govt. quasimodos as to what the document purports to say.

[jamese777]

Then you must know that a Hawaiian official who makes an out of court statement that they have seen the document and it is accurate IS hearsay, and violates the best evidence rule.

That doesnt negate citing Wiki (Phil Berg did it too, and I found that to be comical and it detracted from his credibility too) but the main point of these lawsuits is to compel production of the long form BC, and not rely on hearsay statements from govt. quasimodos as to what the document purports to say.

---

Obama’s original, long form, vault copy Certification of Live Birth can be subpoenaed under Hawaii Statutes [338-18(b)(9)]. To date no prosecutor has sought a subpoena for the original document.
Any sworn testimony in a trial or grand jury proceeding by the director of the Hawaii Deparment of Health would be eyewitness, expert testimony and not hearsay.