Even Jon Stewart is poking fun at it now
http://bluelori.blogspot.com/2009/12/poor-gore-global-warming-debunked-by.html
Gibbs really can’t deal with science questions. Otherwise he’d not be working as Obama’s court clown.
There is simply too much money involved with this charade now.
the bowow is the worst president ever
E-mails reveal more than global-warming scam
UK climate scientist to temporarily step down
Harrabin's Notes: Debating the IPCC
12 Days, 3 Networks and No Mention of ClimateGate Scandal
Al Gore confronted on Climategate in Chicago
ClimateGate: NPR sees silver lining
Stopping climate change (Can you believe somebody actually wrote that?)
Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails
'ClimateGate' deception continues to unfold
All the president's Climategate deniers
Copenhagen Climate Conference to Create 'Huge' Carbon Footprint
Climate Talks Blow More Hot Air
Global Warming on Free Republic
They’re naive - sure. But they aren’t stupid. The Naive One has handlers who can see approaching danger and they won’t let him make any commitments in Copenhagen.
Of course I do the usurpers bidding so lets please move on.
This unprecedented fraud by a “team” of politicized scientists whose research has generated some $20 million in research grants for the CRU hasn’t deterred Obama from his energy- and economy-destroying agenda any more than double-digit unemployment figures have dissuaded him from his failed Keynesian policies>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course!Obama is following the Saul Alinsky plan!
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm
You know, I was watching Ed Begley defending Global Warming and he stated over and over that “Peer Review” papers are what is important and that we should accept them as de facto evidence of proof.
Problem is the baseline information has been manipulated and the models then cannot be repeated. So Peer Review is flawed before assumption and all these guys were in collusion from the get go.
If the information, for a premise you are predisposed to is flawed, then your conclusion will support your inclination.
If the the information for a premise is true, the your predisposition needs to find another way to support your agenda.
Flawed information leads to flawed conclusions, no matter your predisposition.
This should surprise no one. He’s the whole package. A Marxist bent on the destruction of capitalism.
And America is doomed if he isn’t stopped.
Obama is not behaving rationally, one of his handlers told him to go to Copenhagen, so Obama will go no matter what may be divulged. I’m sure that Obama could not give a rational argument for AGW or going to the beggars ball that is Copenhagen.
Apparently the Climate Change Industry is too big too fail and Bambi wants to bail them out.
“...doesn’t alter the president’s firm opinion that “climate change is happening.”
Based on WHAT? Seeing the mockumentary, “An Inconvenient Truth?”
We don’t have access to Obama’s academic records, so we don’t know what science, if any, he studied at Occidental, Columbia or Harvard. His ‘science advisor’ is connected to the fraudsters. But he firmly believes in ‘climate change.’ Yeah it’s called summer, winter, spring and fall.
Click the picture:
And yes, it is a swindle- a fraud and a cheat and a scam-- a deliberately designed construct intended to con you out of things you hold dear-- money, prosperity, freedom... and a few other things, as well.
"The President's global warming agenda is not to be confused with scientific facts."