From your post at 563, the claim I responded to originally:
"only liberals beleive that you can’t beleive the bible because supposedly, the ‘bible was written by fallible man alone."
I DID however explain to you after that post that a person isn’t automatically a liberal for doubting God’s word,- I’ve made this clear several times now- which you conveniently ignored in order to keep the argument focussed on a mistake in wording- I have told you several times now that that is not what I meant, yet you continue on insisting I must have
We’ll clear htis up right now- You are correct inthat I originally did get careless i nthe statement by saying ‘only liberals’- it hsoudl have read ‘liberals’ without hte ‘only’- I have explained to you in following posts that I didn’t mean ‘only liberals’ doubt God’s word, and I’ve never suggested that in my time here on FR- it was a mistake in wording- however, the issue first beign discussed was that you made false allegation that the bible couldn’t be trusted because it suppsoedly was riddled with errors, and I challenged you on that issue to back up your claim- which you ignored- focussing instead on a mistake in wording, and hten turnign the issue from one abotu your false claim to one about our founding fathers and their political persuaisions. I couldn’t for the life of me figure out why the issue suddenly changed fro myour allegation about hte bible to one of someone’s political persuaision, and you’ve still not addressed you origninal accusations about God’s word. If focussing on a mistake in wording, instead of addressing your claims is al lit takes for a self-congratualatory pat on the back for you- then knock yerself out- however, the issue stil lremains that you’re calling into question God’s word, and then runnign from it when asked to back your claims up- and htis sir is hte issue I’ve been tryign to focus on sicne you first brought it up- then you turn aroudn and accuse me of ‘tryign to start a fight’?