[Libloather]

...a politically motivated smear campaign...

Isn't that what warmers do?

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[Islam=Murder]

We can’t let the MSM win this.

Best ClimateGate clips (show everybody you know):

http://www.BraveNewCommie.com

[DB]

“They said a colder than normal October in the U.S. - often cited by warming skeptics - does not make for a trend, no matter how often it is repeated on blogs and cable television.”

Ya, well what is 11 years of declining global temperatures called you freaking morons.

[DB]

They all use Hanson’s and the CRU’s cooked data to say there’s been no decline - hence to hide the decline...

These people are pathetic. Science not.

[goldstategop]

Liberals want to change the subject since they can't defend the science. That's obvious. We don't have the original data so we don't know for sure if they told the truth then or if they are telling it now. In science, to quote the late Carl Sagan, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." None of which has been forthcoming from the AGW crowd.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

[MNJohnnie]

Did this idiot author even bother to read the emails? For example this one? The "evidence" he cites has been fraudulently manipulated from the start.

"The scientific community would come down on me in no uncertain terms if I said the world had cooled from 1998. OK it has but it is only 7 years of data and it isn't statistically significant."

[MNJohnnie]

They said a colder than normal October in the U.S. - often cited by warming skeptics - does not make for a trend, no matter how often it is repeated on blogs and cable television.

This absurdity of this statement from the same people who point to every single hot day as "proof of global warming" speaks for itself.

[ricks_place]

Given the drumbeat is a “politically motivated smear campaign”, the ‘scientists’ are better served by examining the poor quality of the CRUminal temperature adjustment computer code. A “smear campaign” cannot change the inevitable conclusion that the temperature record is deliberately manipulated by advocates and an accurate record is unknown at present.

[WOSG]

“group of the nation’s top scientists defended research on global climate”

The Press Conference was put together by the liberal group “Center for American Progress” ... it was a political stunt by the embattled scientists caught making bad statements and doing bad things.

“hacked e-mails “

NO EMAILS WERE ‘HACKED’ NOR WERE THEY STOLEN - THEY WERE “LEAKED”.

[bt_dooftlook]

Too many lies in one article to bother rebutting.

[Arrowhead1952]

said the mountain of scientific evidence pointing to human-caused climate change is all available for scientific review by any skeptic.

Uh excuse me a second. Didn't they destroy the original data when they moved into a new facility? I think the leaked emails are like a hand grenade thrown into Algore's bunker.

[CRBDeuce]

group of the nation’s top scientists

Now that's funny...did it include Algore?

[rockrr]

I was going to remark about the "criminal breach" - you know, like what the New York Times gets away with all the time, but this was more interesting:

"They said a colder than normal October in the U.S. - often cited by warming skeptics - does not make for a trend, no matter how often it is repeated on blogs and cable television."

I want to take that one in and savor it for a moment.

There.

Breathtaking in its ignorant and hypocritical splendor!

So, if one places their finger in the breeze and then remarks that it is cool for "this time of year", that isn't a trend (even if it has occurred over and over in the last twelve years), but if some bloated gasbag makes a movie conjured up out of pure sick fantasy and proceeds to bash us over the head with it relentlessly and with the agenda of

1. Fleecing the public to line his own pockets and,
2. Legislating profound changes to our lifestyle and possible existence.......that is?!

OK, I've got it now (*snicker*)

[qwertypie]

This article is written with every imaginable slant included, beginning with the “stolen” emails. Comical, not serious.

[driftless2]

I just can’t get over all the “irrefutable” assertions by the warmists. They non-experts have no right challenging their “facts” as they call them. But when actual scientists (i.e Fred Singer, Tim Ball, etal) do challenge their facts, they ignore them.

[Nateman]

Well at least we've gone past the "ignore" phase and are now into the "attack" phase.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

"There is so much information that tells us the planet has been warming," said Gavin Schmidt, a climate modeler at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies. "No independent study is going to come up with anything other than what we've already concluded."

Write this clowns name down....because now we have this:

UK: Met Office to re-examine 160 years of climate data [could take three years]

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

No mention of snowfall near Houston?

[dila813]

All the Damn Data that is Worth to Hide Proves AGW is not a scientific argument.

These guys all need to go to prison.

[Gil4]

“They said a colder than normal October in the U.S. - often cited by warming skeptics - does not make for a trend, no matter how often it is repeated on blogs and cable television”

How about no warming since 1999 - it that a trend yet?

I’m pretty sure 99% of the skeptics realize that a colder October doesn’t necessarily indicate a long-term trend. But we’re also tired of see features about global warming every time some ski resort has a bad winter, and we appreciate the opportunity to send the AGW cultists into a tizzy by playing their game back at them.