Posted on 12/06/2009 9:00:19 AM PST by STARWISE
I changed to non-flushing, what are the problems with it compared to reg. niacin? Thanks for the info, help me out here on the differences...
On the Niacin issue.
http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/niacin-scams.html
Spend some time at Heart Scan blog for a wealth of health information.
Make sure your VitD is D3 and in oil form.
Damn, I wish these experts would get their shit together so we know what the proper dosage is. They can be quite frustrating to us non experts..
My husband, my daughter, and I all see different doctors, who all recommended D3 for different reasons for each of us. I have not noticed “incredible” benefits, but I do think it helps compensate for SAD, and is needed because most of us do not get enough sunshine. Side note: My daughter read a book called: “Survival of the Sickest” which said that sunshine turns cholesterol into vitamin D. The brain, the immune system, and many of the body’s other systems need D.
I think they like to keep us guessing. :>)
Low sales dictate who gets the free commercials in the media.
see post 62
Everyone should do their own research & consult with their doctor - GOOGLE:NIACINAMIDE/ALZHEIMERS
...Damn, I wish these experts would get their shit together so we know what the proper dosage is. They can be quite frustrating to us non experts...
I so totally agree. My doc recommended the non-flush niacin
as I can’t take any of the statins (muscle, joint pain). I take 1500mg daily. He said up to 2000 a day but with some foods I eat I only take the 1500 and have a liver panel done every 6 mos. With the vitamin D3 it’s 2000 a day. Hubby can’t swallow anything bigger than a baby aspirin so I buy the liquid D3. Anyone know if it has less benefits?
UC San Diego School of Medicine has set up an entire website now on Vitamin D deficiency. They are flat out saying that Vitamin D can prevent 75% of the cancers that we are seeing and are trying to set up a public program to get the word out.
This gives you a good overview. Jump to minute 6 for dosage if you are short on time, by minute 9-11 you should be interested/hooked on what they are telling you.
http://www.ucsd.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=16940
A quick 5 minute interview that gives a fast hint as to what has been found.
http://www.uctv.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=16454
Here is the main video on the science. 40 minutes Technical but understandable.
http://www.ucsd.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=15767
bump for later
Get D3. For best results, get the spray version from L.A Naturals brand. It has 180 doses of 5000 iu for $20 retail. I think you squirt it under your tongue. It is the best absorbed and the cheapest. It is discounted to about $11 on Amazon.com.
There has been a lot of debate over the years about how harmful refined sugar is. Many think it is one of the most harmful habits we have, as it is a highly refined substance unlike anything that was available to our ancestors in the quantities we use. A recent statement form the American Heart Association might signal that that belief has, like many before, finally moved from the "health food" believers to the mainstream. Here is a recent AHA release recommending reduced consumption of added sugar in our diets:
http://americanheart.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=800
What the AHA recommends barely allows one soft drink per say, so that tells us that most everyone is far over the new recommendation for added sugar per day.
I've thought for years that refined sugar will eventually be proven to be the most harmful substance humans consume sort of addictive drugs, but it'll be more years before that is settled.
How about jock Itch, does it also cure that??? LOL!!
Liquid is best. Get "D3 Super Strength Spray 5,000 IU by L A Naturals - 1oz." at Amazon.com here
That’s actually quite interesting. I wonder if they have done studies taking hygiene habits into consideration. The West, especially starting in the 20th Century, has been increasingly meticulous in the pursuit of personal hygiene.
The following stats are very old (1985), but I’m curious as to why Gambia shows such low stats:
http://rex.nci.nih.gov/NCI_Pub_Interface/raterisk/rates25.html
Could it be a combination of: exposure to sunlight, hygiene habits and access to pure food, especially fish?
A lot of stats focus on survival rates, but don’t show number of incidences per population.
Close. If the FDA can't regulate it and the drug companies can't make money off it, then they will try to discredit it and outlaw it.
Watch for this in Obamacare.
I believe that's a vitamn A overdose that you get from polar bear livers.
Contary to what people think there really isn’t that much vitamin D in milk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.