Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver
No, I wasn't insinuating that this was a military offenes. I was simply using the definitions of the principles of sentencing to make a point.

A sentence to punishment for punishment's sake is a valid reasoning for sentencing.

42 posted on 12/07/2009 11:15:18 AM PST by BlueLancer (I'm getting a fine tootsy-frootsying right here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: BlueLancer

“A sentence to punishment for punishment’s sake is a valid reasoning for sentencing.”

Yes it is, in some cases it is not needed. These are usually ugly cases with no intent by the parent. If the parent was willfully neglectful then I could see jail time.

If its a case of stupid I don’t see how 5 years in jail time is worse punishment than the loss of a child. Not to mention the cost of keeping this person in jail for those 5 years.

BTW, would you want to be the person picking which rapist, murderer or drug dealer to let out of jail so you have room for this woman?


44 posted on 12/07/2009 11:21:42 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: BlueLancer

The rest of us got it.

Good post.


73 posted on 12/07/2009 12:12:36 PM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson