Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy

His intent was to shoot a deer (DUH~!!!!!!!) I am an avid hunter as is my husband. We are dilligent to make sure everyone at hunting camp knows who is out and where. I was like 20 ft from what I’m sure was a deer in thick brush, but no shootie-shootie as I could not see it and I was on MY OWN LAND and still (believe it or not) bright enough to know better. This guy DID take a shot at movement, but not intending to shoot the girl, so again...WTF does this have to do with the issue? He’s going to pay a heavy price, as will his new child who will have to grow up without a father around.


67 posted on 12/07/2009 11:59:45 AM PST by sevinufnine (Sevin - "If we do not fight when we know we can win, we'll have to fight when we know we will lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: sevinufnine

He meant to shoot whatever was in that field. It was not an accident. He purposefully neglected to verify his target. He was not shooting at a deer. There was no deer in that movement. He intended to shoot at whatever was moving and was hoping it was a deer.

He did exactly what he intended to do. He was just hoping for a better outcome.


75 posted on 12/07/2009 12:15:15 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson