Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

The problem is not arming the crew, but dealing with foreign countries when the ship comes into port. If the ship is not a warship, the firearms aboard must be declared and the paper work becomes horrendous. The other option of assigning armed private guards to each ship is costs that many shippers want to avoid. The crews on these ships are caught between cost cutting bosses and anti gun laws of foreign countries.


3 posted on 12/08/2009 4:19:55 AM PST by Fee (Peace, prosperity, jobs and common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fee

You are correct. It would be cheaper and more acceptable to all of the companies and countries involved to hire a few former military and place them onboard out at sea, and then remove them prior to entering port.

It would also be safer for the sailors.

I know this sound counter intuitive, but it is more realistic.


6 posted on 12/08/2009 4:28:07 AM PST by Vermont Lt (My wife reads my posts. In case the FBI shows up, we will have cookies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Fee; gov_bean_ counter
BOGUS. give captain and first officer keys to a lockup vault with AK-47s or AR-15s and enough ammo...and they will decimate any of those little fishing boats that these POS wannabe pirates have....and kill the perps in the process.

the world needs to get real....Maybe the US can do the whole WW2 thing and make all merchant vessels under the US flag, a semi military organization.

7 posted on 12/08/2009 4:31:47 AM PST by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson