At the present I think its only a relatively few who, for the most part, examine the pronouncements of other scientists because they disagree not as a quality control body. I don't think peer review can be relied upon.
If some body of peers was set up to police science would it not be subject to the corruption as we see now?
34 posted on 12/08/2009 11:18:29 AM PST by count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)