[American Constitutionalist]

They ( the plaintiffs and lawyers ) argued, just were did Obama and his administration get the authority to do the underhanded action that they did to the Chrysler dealers...
They are challenging his authority, thus, his eligibility.

[Hostage]

Thanks but I am still not getting the connection in the direction going from Obama’s ‘authority’ to his ‘eligibilty’.

I certainly understand the reverse direction going from ‘eligibilty’ to his ‘authority’.

I mean I can see the dealers questioning his constitutional authority and I would back them on it.

But the question of eligibility is not settled so we have to assume he was eligible and that he has presidential authority, but it is certainly questionable whether presidential authority allows Obama to act in a manner that might have contributed to those dealers losing their businesses.

BTW I have always questioned Obama’s unwillingness to provide a copy of his long form birth certificate.