[Natural Law]

This is in keeping with your policy of never letting the truth get in the way of a good story. The WSJ article never mentions evolution so you conveniently scrub this through a kook creationist tabloid editorial and then represent it as the work of a reputable news organization. The really funny thing is that if you substituted the word Creationist for AGW both Bret Stephens’ WSJ editorial and William Dembski’s in the Creationist Nathonal Enquirer-like tabloid would both be true and make a lot of sense.

[RoadGumby]

GGG Taking flack again, must be over the target.